Juk ELLI ten po sijonu pasislėpus babkių tonas,
Dar šalia slapta gamykla – MensFactory, kaip šlapia višta,
Dar sovietiniais laikais praminta tik penketais,
Ir naktinė pamaina ten darbuojasi „blatna“.

Ne madoj šiandien baletas, nors rytoj „Korsaras“ kviečia,
Bet M0nika paleidus plaukus šokio ritme visus raukia,
Žavi Karmen ilgu sijonu visus uždega šokio tonu,
Net lezbijietės seiles leidžia, kai balerinos scenoj gaudžia.

Maskvos baletas baisiai brangus jau tuoj sušoks užgesus rampoms,
Korsaras, kaip cigaras brangus, uždegs ir publiką prabangią,
Poniūtės su ilgom sukniom, vėduoklėmis gaivins rankom,
O vyrai scenon tik žiūrės, tad damom nebeliks vilties.

Čigonų taborą galbūt primins spektaklyje truput,
Čigonių akys žaižaruoja ir, kaip anglis, sušildyt moja,
Už lango juk šalta naktis, sapnuojasi čigonės vis,
Žavi Karmen ilgu sijo tik merkia akį, burt vilioja.

Va, va… Sakau, kad labai patogus tas taboras ir tie čigonai… Nes kalba apie narkotikus tampa kalba apie čigonus…
Bet juk pavyzdžiui Klaipėdoje (kuri, berods, lenkia Vilnių narkotikų vartojimu sąlyginiam gyventojui) nėra taboro, kaip jo nėra ir Visagine, kur vartojimas taipogi didelis….
Tikrai neginu čigonų dėl jų darbelių, bet…

Jei mano teorija nepriimtina, tai gal Tamsta galit pasakyti, kodėl netvarkomas taboras?

We report this week on a direct attack by the European Parliament upon the sovereignty of a small member state. Plucky Lithuania passed a law to protect children from homosexual propaganda, which rankled Europe’s new ruling caste. The heavy-handed response may backfire, however, as it could affect next month’s referendum in Ireland, where voters for a second time must decide whether to yoke the Republic to Brussels.

We also bring you up-to-date on the new United Nations super agency for women – a development pro-lifers are viewing with caution. Will it become a new platform for promoting abortion globally? Time will tell…

Spread the word.

Yours truly,

Piero A. Tozzi
Executive Vice President
Volume 12, Number 40
September 17, 2009
European Parliament Raps Lithuania for Curbing Homosexual Advocacy
By Piero A. Tozzi, J.D.
(NEW YORK – C-FAM) The European Parliament voted 349 to 218 today to condemn Lithuania for its „law on the protection of minors“ which prohibits promotion of „homosexual, bisexual or polygamous relations“ among children under 18 in the Baltic nation. Conservative critics contend that the measure, crafted in reaction to the domestic legislation of a sovereign member state pertaining to the family, oversteps the Parliament’s authority.

The resolution directs the Agency for Fundamental Rights to opine on whether the law contravenes European anti-discrimination standards. Any such opinion would be non-binding, though activists would likely use it to press for greater recognition of rights based on „sexual orientation.“

An earlier proposal by the Alliance of Liberal and Democrats for Europe (ALDE), the „liberal“ parliamentary faction, would have initiated proceedings to suspend Lithuania pursuant to article 7 of the Treaty on European Union, the 1992 pact that created the European Union (EU). Parliamentarians principally affiliated with the Christian Democratic grouping, the European People’s Party (EPP), worked behind the scenes to soften the resolution and remove the Article 7 reference.

While „progressive“ parliamentarians lined up to charge Lithuania with promoting „homophobia,“ several EPP and conservative members spoke in opposition to the measure and in support of the country’s sovereign right to pass laws protecting families and children, including Lithuania’s first post-Soviet head of state Vytautas Landsbergis and Slovakian parliamentarian Anna Záborksá.

Nevertheless, the EPP remained divided on the measure, with virtually every EPP member from France voting to censure Lithuania. Surprisingly, Malta’s delegation, including its two EPP representatives, voted as a bloc against Lithuania.

Lithuania’s Parliament, or Seimas, passed the child protection legislation in June. The President vetoed it, in apparent reaction to criticism from Western European politicians and homosexual advocacy organizations. In July, Lithuania’s parliament overrode the veto. The law is scheduled to take effect in March 2010.

David Quinn, Director of Ireland’s Iona Institute and a family rights advocate, called the resolution „a completely unwarranted intrusion in the domestic affairs of a member state.“ Critics such as Quinn see the non-discrimination principle, particularly with respect to sexual orientation, being used to trump long-enshrined values such as religious liberty and parental rights. Quinn called anti-discrimination „the skeleton key that opens every room of the house.“

Some observers expect the Parliamentary action to have repercussions in Ireland, where the nation will vote in a second referendum on the Lisbon Treaty next month.

While the EU has „guaranteed“ that Ireland’s constitutional protection of unborn life would be unaffected by a „yes“ vote on Lisbon, the European Parliament’s action on Lithuania has fueled concerns among Irish euroskeptics that European institutions would seek to override the Republic’s domestic laws. Among other changes, the Lisbon Treaty would make the Charter of Fundamental Rights binding upon members. While silent on abortion, critics fear an activist European Court of Justice reading such a right into the charter.

Forty-six parliamentarians abstained on the Lithuanian resolution, including three Irish EPP members. The four Irish ALDE members broke with their party and voted against the resolution, a move insiders see as tactical and intended to forestall criticism in advance of the Lisbon referendum.